llywela: (Pros-readingisfun)
So I've lately been reading a book called Hancox, by Charlotte Moore, and have absolutely loved it, so wanted to talk about it a bit.

Hancox is the story of a family - no, the history of a family, Moore's own family. The author Charlotte Moore lives at Hancox, an old Tudor farmhouse in East Sussex; her children are the 5th generation of the same family to live in the old house since it was purchased back in the 1880s by a single young woman named Milicent, who was just 20 years old at the time, independent enough and determined enough to set out to run the house and work the farm herself – a far cry from the stereotypical image of the upper middle-class Victorian maiden! Moore is in the fortunate position of coming from a family with a habit of never throwing anything away, which means she is sitting on a veritable goldmine of social history - thousands of letters, journals, sketches, account books, notebooks, postcards, family magazines, school reports, photo albums and the like, from which it is possible to piece together a remarkably full picture of several generations of extended family through the 19th and into the 20th century. Moore makes the point in her introduction that this is the best-documented age in human history, at least among this particular class, who were both highly literate and had sufficient leisure to write, copiously. And so, in Hancox, Moore has pulled together a book that could almost be calculated to tick my boxes - family history, social history, a story about people and personalities, real lives placed within the context of the world in which they lived.

Hancox is full of vivid personalities, drawn from the pages of their correspondence: the bold explorer uncle with a worrisome fondness for young women; the passionate early suffragette who worked tirelessly for women's rights, the querulous lesbian aunt whose lover was accepted as part of the family; the dirt-poor Irish lad who rose to the top of the medical profession; the beautiful young wife who spiralled into insanity which could neither be adequately diagnosed nor treated in the 1860s; the dignified general who refused to shut his insane young wife away but strove for years to keep her at the centre of their family; the lively young lad who joined the army to please his girlfriend only for WWI to break out later that year and see him shot dead within weeks, leaving his family bereft. There's a cousin whose eccentricities would be diagnosed as autism today, while women in successive generations developed what was euphemised as 'the family taint' but would today be diagnosed as mental illness (often triggered by post-natal depression). Moore deftly pulls together the strands of all these interwoven lives to spin a tale as compelling as any novel - maybe more so, because this is not fiction but a biography of real people, lives separated from ours by the passage of time, belonging to an entirely different age, and yet instantly relatable. From the pages of their letters and journals we can trace the issues they had to deal which, not so different from the issues we deal with today: mental health, learning disorders, family arguments, star-crossed lovers divided by disapproving parents, infidelity, friendship, love, loss, loyalty, betrayal - it's all in there, told via the distinct voices of the individuals concerned.

I'm rather fond of this snippet, written in 1920 of an elderly aunt: "[On Bella's wedding day] Aunt Nanny seemed quite cheerful and it was only as the bride and bridegroom were leaving the house that her brow darkened; she had caught sight of a bag of golf clubs. Though severe, she was also sentimental and she expected, I felt sure, that honeymoon couples should do nothing but hold each others' hands; it had shocked her to think they might play golf!"

Anyhoo, I've rambled on long enough – suffice to say that I really enjoyed this book and thoroughly recommend it!
llywela: Life on Mars - Chris reading (LoM-reading)
Over the last eight weeks, I've spent my Thursday evenings glued to the BBC2 drama The Honourable Woman, which came to a captivating end last night. I really enjoyed the show. I enjoyed the complexity of the characters - there were no goodies or baddies here, but rather a full cast of flawed individuals, acting and reacting according to their separate personalities and ideals and ambitions and histories and beliefs. I enjoyed the quantity and variety of female characters in the show - not strong female characters in the unrealistic Hollywood brand but female characters whose strength lies in the depth and versatility and realism of who they are: women who are sometimes weak, who make bad decisions, who are sometimes naive - and sometimes overconfident; women who think and feel; women who sometimes do terrible things or have terrible things done to them and then have to live with the consequences, informing the choices they make thereafter; women who make mistakes; women who make choices; women who do heroic things in impossible situations. It's all good stuff. I enjoyed Stephen Rea's character Hugh Hayden-Hoyle, the nightwatchman spy who slowly regains his sense of purpose through this one last case. I loved Lubna Azabal's character Atika, whose motivations and inner thoughts remained shrouded right till the last, yet whose personality and core beliefs always shone through regardless. I enjoyed that this was a show that required its audience to concentrate and to think about what they were watching, rather than drifting along with only one eye on the telly, as so many of us are wont to do. It isn't perfect - nothing is - but it's a good show, I recommend it.

And while I'm in the pop review mood, I recently finished reading Jo Baker's Longbourn, which on the one hand is Pride and Prejudice from the point of view of the servants, but on the other hand absolutely is not. It's more than that. Pride and Prejudice merely provides the framework for a raw, earthy insight into the lives of the serving class of two centuries ago. In Pride and Prejudice, the servants are practically invisible and the story offers a romantic view of life in the early 1800s, featuring as it does the relative comfort and ease of the gentle classes. In Longbourn the roles are reversed, and all romanticism and idealism is stripped away to reveal the harsh reality of life for the serving class at that time. The Bennets and their friends are mere ghosts around the fringes of the story as their servants take centre stage, working for the family yet entirely removed from the preoccupations and concerns that dominate their thoughts - for the servants have lives and loves and cares and ambitions and dreams and desires and fears and worries all their own. Longbourn is set within the framework of Pride and Prejudice, yet tells an entirely different story - it's an excellent, engrossing, engaging read, and I thoroughly recommend it.

Profile

llywela: (Default)
llywela

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 02:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios