![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
heroes
Still following Heroes on BBC2 each week, and still enjoying the ride. It's really interesting to see how polarised opinions of this show seem to be. Some people rave about it, others seem to get bored and give up very early on, usually citing too many characters and complicated plot as their reason. Me, I'm finding the characters engaging enough so far, not having any trouble keeping up with them all, and the storyline is holding my interest. I'm very impressed by the interweaving storylines of the various characters so far.
I'm always rather intrigued by the way different shows will hook different people for different reasons. I mean, I can usually say why I've become attached to a certain show - usually in mind-numbing detail, if anyone stands still long enough to listen! But I find I can very rarely define why I don't like/watch a show. 'It just didn't grab me' usually covers it, but I never really know why. Maybe because I haven't watched in enough detail to really understand my own reasoning...
It got me thinking about how shows often divide into two categories. The first category is bubblegum. These are shows that are easy for casual viewers to dip in and out of, that can be caught up on and followed with ease without requiring any commitment to viewing, because you are only expected to watch on a shallow, surface level. They are fun to watch, but often unsatisfying on a deeper level.
The other type is the more serious show, the kind with intricate ongoing mytharc plotting and character development. Sure, you can still skip in and out, watch on a surface level, but in order to really get the most out of these shows you have to really commit yourself to watching every episode with brain engaged, to thinking about what's happening, re-watching over and over in order to catch every subtle nuance. These shows can build up a huge cult following, or even a huge popular following, but are risky for networks because they are less likely to capture the casual viewers.
...I'm sure I had a point in there somewhere, but it escapes me now. Anyway. Yeah, I'm still enjoying Heroes. I haven't really attached to any of the characters yet, and long-term I do tend to need at least one character that I'm deeply attached to, who will keep me watching no matter what. But I do care about finding out what happens to them all, which counts for a lot. Plus, it's got the thrill factor of moments like Nathan shooting off into the sky and going supersonic last night, which was very cool and delighted me muchly. Now that Peter has more information and has hooked up with Isaac in search of answers, I'm engaging with him more and being less distracted by his silly hair and droopy mouth. Policeman Matt's wife is distracting me instead because I remember her from her Home & Away days, back when she had an Australian accent. Hiro isn't bugging me as much, although his cute-as-a-button shtick is getting old. So yeah, so far so good.
I'm always rather intrigued by the way different shows will hook different people for different reasons. I mean, I can usually say why I've become attached to a certain show - usually in mind-numbing detail, if anyone stands still long enough to listen! But I find I can very rarely define why I don't like/watch a show. 'It just didn't grab me' usually covers it, but I never really know why. Maybe because I haven't watched in enough detail to really understand my own reasoning...
It got me thinking about how shows often divide into two categories. The first category is bubblegum. These are shows that are easy for casual viewers to dip in and out of, that can be caught up on and followed with ease without requiring any commitment to viewing, because you are only expected to watch on a shallow, surface level. They are fun to watch, but often unsatisfying on a deeper level.
The other type is the more serious show, the kind with intricate ongoing mytharc plotting and character development. Sure, you can still skip in and out, watch on a surface level, but in order to really get the most out of these shows you have to really commit yourself to watching every episode with brain engaged, to thinking about what's happening, re-watching over and over in order to catch every subtle nuance. These shows can build up a huge cult following, or even a huge popular following, but are risky for networks because they are less likely to capture the casual viewers.
...I'm sure I had a point in there somewhere, but it escapes me now. Anyway. Yeah, I'm still enjoying Heroes. I haven't really attached to any of the characters yet, and long-term I do tend to need at least one character that I'm deeply attached to, who will keep me watching no matter what. But I do care about finding out what happens to them all, which counts for a lot. Plus, it's got the thrill factor of moments like Nathan shooting off into the sky and going supersonic last night, which was very cool and delighted me muchly. Now that Peter has more information and has hooked up with Isaac in search of answers, I'm engaging with him more and being less distracted by his silly hair and droopy mouth. Policeman Matt's wife is distracting me instead because I remember her from her Home & Away days, back when she had an Australian accent. Hiro isn't bugging me as much, although his cute-as-a-button shtick is getting old. So yeah, so far so good.
no subject
It's a great show. Sure, it starts slowly, but by the 10th episode (or so), it's just so good.
It's not "Lost" good, but it's still the best new show on TV.
no subject
See, the Lost comparison doesn't do much for me because Lost never caught my imagination and I stopped watching. But Heroes is still holding my attention, which is good. :)